Leaders are a different breed. Their actions and visions could make a nation prosper or doom, companies profiting or downsizing and most certainly the difference between war and peace.
Now I’m not going to write about political leaders. Let’s leave that to the experts. What I’m going to write about is on leadership in an organization, captains of the corporate industries.
Well what is leadership? According to renowned guru Peter F. Drucker, “Leadership is the lifting of man’s sight to higher vision, the raising of a man’s standard to higher performance, the building of man’s personality beyond its normal limitations. Leadership is thus essential if the organizations are to be more than warehouses for machines.”
Big words indeed but those words perfectly sum up the definition of leadership. A great leader is one who is able to anticipate the future, establish clear visions, communicates goals, sets and provides the values of excellence, balancing conflicts, eliminates boundaries and motivates the masses
I have and you too have seen many styles of leadership. There is one golden rule of leadership, which is there are no superlative styles. True leaders practice a combination of leadership styles depending on the situations.
There are numbers of leadership styles as we have learnt in any business books. Let us refresh our memories to what some of them are;
Autocratic style leadership
The leader centralizes authority and allows limited participation by others. Demands full power over decision making.
Participative of democratic style leadership
Substantial participation from others in decision making process and allows freedom to communicate.
Free rein/free-run style leadership
Leader is passive and allows freedom to its members to establish their own goals and make their own decisions.
Bureaucratic style of leadership
Leader is rule centered. Rules and specific procedures are set to administer the conduct of subordinates for work performance.
Delegative style of leadership
Leader transfers decision making power to others, but remains responsible for their decisions.
By combining some of the styles, leaders are able to effectively coaxed subordinates to higher performance. Some situation would even conjure more pressing styles or using styles tailored to any subordinates individuality.
Scholl, R. W. believes that leadership styles are determined by two theories, cognitive choice theory and the personality theory. The cognitive choice theory states that the leader actively chooses the leadership style that will be most effective in increasing employee performance, while the personality theory states that the leadership style happens naturally based on the leader’s personality.
Great leaders apply leadership styles that are determined by combination of both theories. By deliberately choosing the suitable leadership style based on the situation and combined with using the leadership style that is most comfortable for the leader’s personality, most likely will lead to an effective leadership. Therefore, interpreting both theories to determine which style or styles to use at a given scenario will be the best course of action to become an effective leader
While natural leaders are born, great leaders are nurtured to become one. If we want to succeed as leaders, we need to surround ourselves with smarter people, be fair and open-minded, rejects personal gain and learn to trust and empower our subordinates to maximize their potential. In order to move to a greater height, groom a successor to take over your job.
Former GE CEO Jack Welch is a big believer in building internal succession plans. In his 2001 book, he wrote of choosing his successor, "Making the pick was not only the most important decision of my career, it was the most difficult and agonizing one I ever had to make. For at least a year, it was often the first thing I thought about each morning and the last thing on my mind at night.” He took over six years to groom a successor from a handful of clear finalists before he finally retires. Being a good leader is hard; being a great leader is even harder.
Continue reading...